<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesgannon.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesgannon.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy by Case Law: Jones v Tsige &#8211; the Ontario Courts recognise a privacy tort &#8211; Hugh Tomlinson QC &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2012/01/19/ontario-court-of-appeal-awards-damages-for-invasion-of-personal-privacy/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case Law: Jones v Tsige &#8211; the Ontario Courts recognise a privacy tort &#8211; Hugh Tomlinson QC &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1427#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy&#8221; James Gannon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy&#8221; James Gannon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canadian Hosting Provider Cites Weak Copyright Law to Attract Pirate Websites by Bill C-11, &#8220;Digital Locks&#8221;, and Copyright Reform: What Kind of Business Models Do We Want to Encourage? &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2012/01/04/canadian-hosting-provider-cites-weak-copyright-law-to-attract-pirate-websites/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill C-11, &#8220;Digital Locks&#8221;, and Copyright Reform: What Kind of Business Models Do We Want to Encourage? &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1391#comment-158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Hosting Services. As I recently pointed out, certain Canadian hosting providers have turned Canada&#8217;s weak copyright laws into a business [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hosting Services. As I recently pointed out, certain Canadian hosting providers have turned Canada&#8217;s weak copyright laws into a business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canadian BitTorrent Sites Dominate Rogue Website Lists in SOPA Submissions by Bill C-11, &#8220;Digital Locks&#8221;, and Copyright Reform: What Kind of Business Models Do We Want to Encourage? &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2011/11/17/canadian-bittorrent-sites-dominate-rogue-website-lists-in-sopa-submissions/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill C-11, &#8220;Digital Locks&#8221;, and Copyright Reform: What Kind of Business Models Do We Want to Encourage? &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1370#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] BitTorrent Websites. It is also well known that Canada is home to many of the world&#8217;s most popular BitTorrent websites. There is no question that these websites enable and induce infringement on a massive scale. They [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BitTorrent Websites. It is also well known that Canada is home to many of the world&#8217;s most popular BitTorrent websites. There is no question that these websites enable and induce infringement on a massive scale. They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCER: &#8220;omg, canadian government totally not paying attention to game pirates!&#8221; by Bill C-11, &#8220;Digital Locks&#8221;, and Copyright Reform: What Kind of Business Models Do We Want to Encourage? &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2010/05/10/ccer-omg-canadian-government-totally-not-paying-attention-to-game-pirates/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill C-11, &#8220;Digital Locks&#8221;, and Copyright Reform: What Kind of Business Models Do We Want to Encourage? &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=623#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the government’s 2009 open consultation on copyright reform, these hacking chip makers pleaded with their customers to send letters to the Canadian government demanding that TPM-hacking remain [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the government’s 2009 open consultation on copyright reform, these hacking chip makers pleaded with their customers to send letters to the Canadian government demanding that TPM-hacking remain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill C-11 and statutory damages: a guide for Canadian copyright law by Bill C-11 could bring SOPA-like online - Stormfront</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2011/10/06/bill-c-11-and-statutory-damages-a-guide-for-canadian-copyright-law/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill C-11 could bring SOPA-like online - Stormfront]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1301#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy by New personal privacy tort in Ontario &#8211; what are the implications? &#124; Lexpert Magazine - Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2012/01/19/ontario-court-of-appeal-awards-damages-for-invasion-of-personal-privacy/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New personal privacy tort in Ontario &#8211; what are the implications? &#124; Lexpert Magazine - Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1427#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy: James Gannon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy: James Gannon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy by Suing for Snooping - Privacy Intrusion Actionable in Ontario &#124; class actions, common law, damages, intrusion upon seclusion, privacy, sensitive information &#124; snIP/ITs</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2012/01/19/ontario-court-of-appeal-awards-damages-for-invasion-of-personal-privacy/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suing for Snooping - Privacy Intrusion Actionable in Ontario &#124; class actions, common law, damages, intrusion upon seclusion, privacy, sensitive information &#124; snIP/ITs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1427#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] James Gannon&#8217;s post &#8220;Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy&#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Gannon&#8217;s post &#8220;Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy by Privacy Policy &#124; SeattleWebMarketingFirm.com</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2012/01/19/ontario-court-of-appeal-awards-damages-for-invasion-of-personal-privacy/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Privacy Policy &#124; SeattleWebMarketingFirm.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1427#comment-152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of information breachNetflix wants to amend the Video Privacy Protection Act to reveal what &#8230;Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy    .broken_link, a.broken_link { text-decoration: line-through; }   function mainmenu(){ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of information breachNetflix wants to amend the Video Privacy Protection Act to reveal what &#8230;Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy    .broken_link, a.broken_link { text-decoration: line-through; }   function mainmenu(){ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontario Court of Appeal awards damages for invasion of personal privacy by Invasion of Privacy Tort in Ontario - Implications for Entertainment Lawyers : Entertainment &#38; Media Law Signal</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2012/01/19/ontario-court-of-appeal-awards-damages-for-invasion-of-personal-privacy/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Invasion of Privacy Tort in Ontario - Implications for Entertainment Lawyers : Entertainment &#38; Media Law Signal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1427#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] number of other commentators have already opined on the decision (see Ha-Redeye, Sookman, Hayes, Gannon), so I would like to just summarize the highlights and then comment on the importance of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number of other commentators have already opined on the decision (see Ha-Redeye, Sookman, Hayes, Gannon), so I would like to just summarize the highlights and then comment on the importance of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canadian BitTorrent Sites Dominate Rogue Website Lists in SOPA Submissions by Canadian Hosting Provider Cites Weak Copyright Law to Attract Pirate Websites &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog</title>
		<link>http://jamesgannon.ca/2011/11/17/canadian-bittorrent-sites-dominate-rogue-website-lists-in-sopa-submissions/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canadian Hosting Provider Cites Weak Copyright Law to Attract Pirate Websites &#171; James Gannon&#039;s IP Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesgannon.ca/?p=1370#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] U.S. about their proposed IP enforcement law, the Stop Online Piracy Act (&#8220;SOPA&#8221;). As I previously noted, when creator groups were asked which websites they intended to target with SOPA&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U.S. about their proposed IP enforcement law, the Stop Online Piracy Act (&#8220;SOPA&#8221;). As I previously noted, when creator groups were asked which websites they intended to target with SOPA&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

